Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Louisiana Toughens Texting Ban

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

New law will help save lives

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood commended Governor Bobby Jindal for signing a new law on Thursday, which makes texting while driving in Louisiana a primary offense beginning August 15, 2010.

“Innocent people should not lose their lives because someone chose to text while driving,” said Secretary LaHood. “That’s why I’m pleased Louisiana has passed a tough new law banning this irresponsible behavior. This sends a clear message: texting and driving don’t mix.”

This law strengthens Louisiana’s 2008 texting ban, which allowed law enforcement officials to ticket drivers caught using their phones only if they were pulled over for another offense. Drivers caught texting behind the wheel will continue to face a fine of $175 for the first offense and up to $500 for any that follow.

According to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), nearly 6,000 people died in 2008 in crashes involving a distracted or inattentive driver, and more than half a million were injured.

NHTSA has developed sample legislation that states can use to craft measures banning texting behind the wheel. The sample bill is patterned after President Obama’s October 1, 2009, Executive Order prohibiting federal employees from texting while operating government-owned vehicles and equipment. Last year, more than 200 distracted driving bills were under consideration by state legislatures, and the pace has increased this year.

Recently, Secretary LaHood launched pilot programs in New York and Connecticut as part of a “Phone in One Hand. Ticket in the Other.” campaign to study whether increased enforcement and public awareness can reduce distracted driving behavior.

For more information on distracted driving and the Department of Transportation’s work, visit www.distraction.gov.

Lawlor Winston at www.LawlorWinston.com.

Intel Settlement Includes Broad New Restrictions on the Chipmaker

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

The FTC says, if finalized, the settlement would go beyond various antitrust complaints brought against Intel and could fire up competition in the semiconductor market.

The Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday that giant chipmaker Intel Corp. had agreed to step back from certain practices, such as using “predatory-design” tactics that regulators alleged stifled competition and deprived consumers of better choices for at least a decade.

The FTC said the settlement, which if finalized would resolve a suit filed by the commission in December, goes well beyond the terms stemming from other antitrust complaints brought by foreign governments and rival firms against Intel. The new restrictions would apply to a broader range of chips and help restore competition in the semiconductor market, officials said.

The Santa Clara company controls about 80% of the world’s market for central microprocessors, which function as the brains of desktop and laptop computers. And Intel holds about a 50% share in the increasingly important market for graphic computing chips.

Contact Lawlor Winston at www.lawlorwinston.com for more information.

Friday, August 20th, 2010

Merrick Pet Care Recalls Texas Hold’ems 10 oz Bag (Item # 60016 Lot 10127 Best by May 6 2012) because of Possible Salmonella Health Risk

Merrick Pet Care, Inc. of Amarillo, Texas is extending its July 2,2010 recall of 10 oz “Beef Filet Squares for Dogs (Texas Hold’Ems)” pet treat (ITEM # 60016 LOT # 10084TL7 BEST BY MARCH 24, 2012) to also include 83 cases of “Texas Hold’ems” (ITEM # 60016 LOT # 10127 BEST BY MAY 6, 2012) because they have the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella. Salmonella can affect animals and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products. People handling the treats can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the chews or any surfaces exposed to these products. Consumers should dispose of these products in a safe manner by securing them in a covered trash receptacle.

Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers immediately.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian immediately.

The Beef Filet Squares (Texas Hold ‘Ems) were shipped to distributors and retailers throughout the US. These individuals have been notified and have activated their recall procedures.

The treats are sold in 1Ooz plastic bags marked with “Lot # 10127 Best By May 6, 2012″ on the top of the bag and on a sticker applied to the bottom.

No illnesses have been reported to date for either lot of product. A sample tested positive for Salmonella.

Consumers who have purchased 10 ounce packages of”Texas Hold’ems” are urged to return the unused portion to the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-800-664-7387 M-F 8:00 – 5:00 CDT.

Contact Lawlor Winston at www.lawlorwinston.com for more information.

Lawlor Winston Attorney, Ben Murphey, Overturns Summary Final Judgment in Bender v. Caregivers of America, Inc., Case No. 4D09-2930

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

Lawlor Winston Attorney, Ben Murphey, Overturns Summary Final Judgment in Bender v. Caregivers of America, Inc., Case No. 4D09-2930

Ft. Lauderdale, FL, August 18, 2010 – Attorney Ben Murphey successfully appealed a Summary Final Judgment entered in favor of a home health agency based on an alleged exculpatory agreement.  In this case, the firm’s client, Ethel Bender, contracted with Caregivers of America, Inc. for home health services.  Caregivers had Ms. Bender sign multiple “Transportation Responsibility Releases” that it claimed absolved it of any liability for when its home health aide drove Ms. Bender around town.  During one of those trips, Caregivers’ aide crashed her car and seriously injured Ms. Bender.
Following the accident, Ms. Bender sued Caregivers for its vicarious liability for the aide’s negligence.  Caregivers then filed a Motion for Summary Final Judgment claiming the Release barred the lawsuit.  Mr. Murphey argued the release was defective because it failed to state the Release covered claims based on negligence.  Caregivers argued that because its liability was vicarious, inclusion of the word negligence was not necessary.  In its ruling, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal conclusively established that exculpatory releases absolving a party of even vicarious liability for negligence must include the word negligence.
Mr. Murphey’s work in this appeal has created a clear expansion of the requirements applicable to exculpatory releases.  The opinion will have far-reaching effects in this area of the law.  The entire opinion is available at www.4dca.org/opinions/Aug%202010/08-18-10/4D09-2930.op.pdf.
# # #
The law firm of Lawlor Winston provides the very best representation to their clients – ensuring they are represented at the highest and most effective levels, focusing on protecting the rights of individuals and families. Practice areas include Catastrophic Personal Injury including Wrongful Death, Auto Accidents, Premises Liability, Insurance Bad Faith Disputes, Professional Malpractice, Commercial Litigation, Maritime/Admiralty, Labor & Employment Disputes and ERISA Claims. The firm is headquartered at 2211 Davie Blvd, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312. They may be contacted at (954) 525-2345. Additional information about Lawlor Winston may be obtained from the Firm's website at www.LawlorWinston.com.

Lawlor Winston Attorney, Ben Murphey, Wins Dismissal of Appeal in Guarneri v. Nussbaum

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Lawlor Winston Attorney, Ben Murphey, Wins Dismissal of Appeal in Guarneri v. Nussbaum

August 8, 2010, Ft. Lauderdale, FL – Mr. Nussbaum sued Dr. Ralph Guarneri for alleged medical malpractice committed during a surgical procedure.  After months of litigation, the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida struck Dr. Guarneri’s pleadings for multiple discovery violations.  Dr. Guarneri appealed the ruling to the Fourth District Court of Appeal.  Attorney Ben Murphey argued the Appellate Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the Trial Court’s ruling was a non-final order incapable of appellate review.  The Fourth District Court of Appeal agreed and, within two weeks of oral argument, dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.  The case will return to the Trial Court and proceed to a trial on damages.
# # # The law firm of Lawlor Winston provides the very best representation to their clients – ensuring they are represented at the highest and most effective levels, focusing on protecting the rights of individuals and families. Practice areas include Catastrophic Personal Injury including Wrongful Death, Auto Accidents, Premises Liability, Insurance Bad Faith Disputes, Professional Malpractice, Commercial Litigation, Maritime/Admiralty, Labor & Employment Disputes and ERISA Claims. The firm is headquartered at 2211 Davie Blvd, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312. They may be contacted at (954) 525-2345. Additional information about Lawlor Winston may be obtained from the Firm's website at www.LawlorWinston.com.

Texting Drivers Increase Accident Risk

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Florida does not have a ban on texting while driving, which leaves motorists on I-95, 595, the Florida Turnpike and other Broward streets at greater risk of injury or death from an auto accident or a truck accident.

Be aware of the drivers around you who may be drifting across lanes or driving slowly. These are signs of distracted drivers who are likely to be on the phone chatting with a friend, checking on directions, or trying to catch up with email or instant messages.

If you are in a serious motor vehicle accident on South Florida roads, the personal injury attorneys at Lawlor Winston can help you investigate if the other driver may have been negligent due to the use of a cell phone or Blackberry.

Of course, it is never a good idea to engage in this behavior yourself. Always drive defensively and look out for signs of distracted drivers.

Contact Lawlor Winston LLP

Call the Fort Lauderdale personal injury law firm of Lawlor Winston, LLP (www.lawlorwinston.com) at 954-525-2345 for a free consultation if you have suffered harm as a result of distracted driving.

South Florida Awaits BP Oil Spill Ocean Currents

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010
Will tar be tarnishing South Florida’s beautiful beaches and threatening our local economy? Pensacola and other Florida coastal communities are already experiencing damages from the greatest oil spill in U.S. history.
Deepwater Horizon, an offshore oil drilling platform located in the Gulf of Mexico near Louisiana, exploded into flames on Tuesday, April 20, 2010, and sank two days later. The rig was owned by Transocean Ltd., and operated under contract to international oil giant BP.
South Florida officials and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection are closely monitoring movement of contaminated Gulf waters.
Oil from the BP spill may travel around the southern tip of Florida and up the east coast to North Carolina, according to one simulation published by scientists at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The actual route taken by the estimated 630,000 barrels of oil spilled into the Gulf will depend on many weather conditions, including the Gulf’s Loop Current, winds, and potential hurricane activity.
Significant risks to the South Florida economy will result if tar does reach our pristine beaches. The economic impact may be felt by hotel workers, restaurant employees, tourism operators, fishermen, the boating industry, and many other sectors of our tourism and hospitality-sensitive economy.
Contact Lawlor Winston, LLP
If you or someone you love is at risk of injury or loss as a result of the BP oil spill, talk to the Fort Lauderdale personal injury attorneys at Lawlor Winston, LLP (www.lawlorwinston.com). You can reach us at 954-525-2345 for a free consultation.

Will tar be tarnishing South Florida’s beautiful beaches and threatening our local economy? Pensacola and other Florida coastal communities are already experiencing damages from the greatest oil spill in U.S. history.

Deepwater Horizon, an offshore oil drilling platform located in the Gulf of Mexico near Louisiana, exploded into flames on Tuesday, April 20, 2010, and sank two days later. The rig was owned by Transocean Ltd., and operated under contract to international oil giant BP.

South Florida officials and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection are closely monitoring movement of contaminated Gulf waters.

Oil from the BP spill may travel around the southern tip of Florida and up the east coast to North Carolina, according to one simulation published by scientists at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The actual route taken by the estimated 630,000 barrels of oil spilled into the Gulf will depend on many weather conditions, including the Gulf’s Loop Current, winds, and potential hurricane activity.

Significant risks to the South Florida economy will result if tar does reach our pristine beaches. The economic impact may be felt by hotel workers, restaurant employees, tourism operators, fishermen, the boating industry, and many other sectors of our tourism and hospitality-sensitive economy.

Contact Lawlor Winston, LLP

If you or someone you love is at risk of injury or loss as a result of the BP oil spill, talk to the Fort Lauderdale personal injury attorneys at Lawlor Winston, LLP (www.lawlorwinston.com). You can reach us at 954-525-2345 for a free consultation.

McDonald’s & Maytag Issue Product Recalls

Monday, June 7th, 2010
McDonald’s Recalls Shrek Drinking Glasses
Twelve million “Shrek Forever After 3D” drinking glasses are being voluntarily recalled by McDonald’s, in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
The recall, announced on June 4, 2010, applies to four styles of Shrek glasses that were being sold for $2 each as a promotional tie-in with the movie “Shrek Forever After.”
The designs on the glasses were found to contain the carcinogen cadmium. Long-term exposure to cadmium can cause serious health effects including kidney, lung, intestinal or bone damage.
For additional information, contact McDonald’s toll-free at (800) 244-6227 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. CT Monday through Friday or visit the firm’s website at www.mcdonalds.com/glasses.
Maytag Recalls Unsafe Dishwashers
Certain Maytag dishwashers sold between 2006 and 2010 pose a serious fire hazard as a result of an electrical failure in the dishwasher’s heating element.
Maytag is voluntarily recalling about 1.7 million of these dishwashers, in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Dishwashers sold under the names Maytag®, Amana®, Jenn-Air®, Admiral®, Magic Chef®, Performa by Maytag® and Crosley® with plastic tubs and certain serial numbers are subject to the recall.
If you own a Maytag dishwasher, contact Maytag at (800) 544-5513 anytime, or visit the firm’s website at www.repair.maytag.com for more information.
Contact Lawlor Winston, LLP
If you or someone you love has suffered an injury as a result of a defective product, call the Fort Lauderdale personal injury attorneys at Lawlor Winston, LLP (www.lawlorwinston.com) at 954-525-2345 for a free consultation.

McDonald’s Recalls Shrek Drinking Glasses

Twelve million “Shrek Forever After 3D” drinking glasses are being voluntarily recalled by McDonald’s, in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

The recall, announced on June 4, 2010, applies to four styles of Shrek glasses that were being sold for $2 each as a promotional tie-in with the movie “Shrek Forever After.”

The designs on the glasses were found to contain the carcinogen cadmium. Long-term exposure to cadmium can cause serious health effects including kidney, lung, intestinal or bone damage.

For additional information, contact McDonald’s toll-free at (800) 244-6227 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. CT Monday through Friday or visit the firm’s website at www.mcdonalds.com/glasses.

Maytag Recalls Unsafe Dishwashers

Certain Maytag dishwashers sold between 2006 and 2010 pose a serious fire hazard as a result of an electrical failure in the dishwasher’s heating element.

Maytag is voluntarily recalling about 1.7 million of these dishwashers, in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Dishwashers sold under the names Maytag®, Amana®, Jenn-Air®, Admiral®, Magic Chef®, Performa by Maytag® and Crosley® with plastic tubs and certain serial numbers are subject to the recall.

If you own a Maytag dishwasher, contact Maytag at (800) 544-5513 anytime, or visit the firm’s website at www.repair.maytag.com for more information.

Contact Lawlor Winston, LLP

If you or someone you love has suffered an injury as a result of a defective product, call the Fort Lauderdale personal injury attorneys at Lawlor Winston, LLP (www.lawlorwinston.com) at 954-525-2345 for a free consultation.

Some Questions?

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

In a Civil lawsuit, I am in the middle of Discovery and have ordered into Mediation. Can discovery continue?: Court has ordered me into Mediation on a false civil lawsuit. Being in the middle of discovery, do I have to put the process of discovery on “hold”, till after Mediaition, or can I continue to collect information?

Posted about 1 month ago in Litigation

Andrew’s answer: I agree completely with the other responders. However, I’m curious as to what you mean by “false civil lawsuit”.

Posted about 1 month ago.

 


Stolen Car in Shoppin Mall’s Parking lot; Do I have a case?: My car was stolen in a large shopping mall’s parking lot where I’m employed. I advised a security guard that was sitting in his car by the entrance immediately about the incident, but they acted, in my opinion, very inadequately. They told me they needed to search the entire mall’s parking lot for the car before the police could be called even though I assured them that I had been employed for five months and therefore park in the same place all the time. The search took about 10-15 minutes. After about 10 minutes of the beginning of the ’search’ my manager told me I was better off to call the police myself. At this point, the police came to aid me. Can I seek reparations?

Posted 11 months ago in Lawsuits / Disputes

Andrew’s answer: Probably not. Such a short delay in responding would likely have made little difference in solving this crime. Moreoever, calling the police yourself was certainly something you should do immediately in this situation. It is possible there may be some liability on the part of the mall for failing to maintain adequate security, but that would be a difficult case. Good luck.

Posted about 1 month ago.

 


Car in husbands name. Son handed over keys to another to get something out of car. Individual took car with another person and: went for a joy ride totalling the car. Injury of passenger. Being sued. Can they go after assets if they are in the name of the spouse who is not on the title of the car?

Posted 7 months ago in Lawsuits / Disputes

Andrew’s answer: If you have insurance, turn this claim/lawsuit over to your agent for handling. It is what you paid premiums for. Your insurance carrier has a duty to defend and indemnify you. If you do not have insurance, seek defense counsel on your own–you have defenses available to you. If your husband ignores this, and a judgment is obtained against him, jointly held assets are likely not attachable. However, in Florida, if you do not comply with the Financial Responsibility laws regarding maintaining minimum insurance, he may lose his driver’s license and any vehicle registrations until the judgment is satisfied.

Posted about 1 month ago.

 



 

www.LawlorWinston.com

 


The 2003 Reform of Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Laws as it Pertains to Florida’s Injured Workers

Friday, January 15th, 2010

“I am an invisible man…a man of substance, of flesh and bone, fiber and liquids—and I might even be said to possess a mind. I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me.”

Perhaps, it could be more simply summed up as “[t]rue is it that we have seen better days….” The only certainty is that the future for injured workers in Florida is uncertain. The self-executing nature of the workers’ compensation system in Florida is under attack, and this will only result in additional injury to Florida’s injured workers. Prior to 1990, the Judges of Compensation Claims (JCCs) had the authority to hear disputes regarding an injured worker’s AWW, unpaid medical bills, unpaid medical mileage, unauthorized rehabilitation, MMI, plus all facets of medical care (i.e. changes in doctors, IMEs, the need for subsequent referrals, and testing). Injured workers and their attorneys were less litigious, and the penultimate goal (second to healing the injured worker) was getting the injured worker to MMI so that the claim could be settled.

When it passed the 1990 and 1993 reforms, the Florida Legislature repeatedly whittled away at the power of the JCCs. With the advent of the Employee Assistance Office, the Agency for Healthcare Administration, mandatory managed care, and requests for assistance, the legislature caused a “splintering” of the workers’ compensation system. Placing these new hurdles between the injured worker, their benefits, and the JCC, caused a delay in payments and a delay in the resolution of disputes. This caused the dissatisfaction of the injured worker to rise. In fact, injured worker dissatisfaction was proffered as one of the reasons for increased attorney involvement in Florida.

The 2003 reform will limit an injured worker’s ability to retain legal counsel, access the courts, and quickly resolve disputes regarding compensation benefits. This author submits that by passing this reform the legislature is pushing an already delicate situation closer toward critical mass. However, the 2003 reform could face some constitutional challenges. The mandatory limiting of psychiatric impairment ratings to one percent might violate both the due process and equal protection guarantees of the Constitution of the United States of America. The limitation of attorney’s fees and denial of hearings—absent the showing of good cause—on claims involving only AWW issues, medical mileage, and claims with less than $5,000 worth of benefits in controversy might violate the guarantee of access to the courts provided for in the Constitution of the State of Florida.

“Florida’s workers’ compensation system [should be] affordable, efficient, and above all equitable.” Equity will not abound as a result of the 2003 reform. The system will not be more efficient. The system was already clearly profitable, and therefore affordability could be controlled by reducing profits, instead of reducing benefits, but the reformists have prevailed, and so: “[o]nce more unto the breach, dear friends, once more….” For the injured workers of Florida, let Tallahassee be their Harfleur. “Stiffen the sinews, [conjure] up the blood, Disguise fair nature with hard favor’d rage; Then lend the eye a terrible aspect….” Continue the fight for benefits in the courts and with the lobbyists. That is, for what benefits the 2003 reform has left for the injured worker, and finally never forget to “wait and hope.”

M. Benjamin Murphey, Esq.

www.LawlorWinston.com